FGM in Iran? Yes, as a new book shows

Is female genital mutilation an African issue? A women’s problem? A religious requirement? A feminist concern?

Playing devil’s advocate, the answer in every case is that FGM shatters these limiting frames. Ablation of girls’ genitalia isn’t the unique concern of Africans, women, theologians or feminists. Ending FGM requires all people of good will, as Kameel Ahmady and his research team convey in the just published volume, In the Name of Tradition. Female Genital Mutilation in Iran (Frankfurt am Main: UnCUT/VOICES Press, 2016).

Sharp metal objects bite vulvas in Iran, thus providing certainty that FGM exceeds the confines of a continent known to have birthed our earliest recorded ancestors. … Indeed, these facts imply excision’s spread from a Blue Nilotic epicenter to be taken up, for complex reasons, elsewhere around the globe.

Kameel Ahmady photo

Kameel Ahmady

Moreover, Kameel Ahmady is a man whose questioning of male peers reveals degrees of men’s involvement, broadening ownership and thus accountability beyond the female sphere. Regarding religion, Ahmady opens the door to Farsi discussions inaccessible to most readers of his book, and what he shows is a fascinating potpourri of clerical back and forth. Writ large in most analyses of genital excision is the custom’s absence from the Koran and indeed from the scriptures of most faiths. Yet we find the local mullahs differing as to the duties of their flocks. Some tell the devout that releasing clitoral blood is not forbidden; others recommend it; still others leave the decision to the grown-up children; many also counsel against it. Ahmady himself is sure: Islam doesn’t condone ablation of a child’s genitalia given Koranic commands to ‘do no harm’.

And as a feminist issue?

Here, too, Kameel Ahmady stands out among students of these ‘rites’. Though in youth he had suspected it, only later in life did he learn of his own female relatives’ victimization; empathy with his mother and sisters spurred him to take up the abolition cause. He supports women’s empowerment. He understands the challenge to self-confidence resulting from the symbolic and actual infliction of a disability. He sees that clitoral attack, beyond rationalizations and even in the mildest forms that leave few or no physical scars, affects the mind. Why should female organs of sexuality and procreation be handled fiercely rather than gently? What possible psychological reality could account for such behavior as espoused by individuals and groups when the act itself is surely counter-intuitive for everyone?

Anthr/apologists have a ready answer: pain itself is valued. If, however, this explanation once sufficed, it does so no longer as human and children’s rights have, since at least World War II, presented themselves as universal standards to which Ahmady unequivocally subscribes. Thus, if we define feminism as the theory seeking to enhance the world by cleansing it of gender-based discrimination, FGM is a feminist issue par excellence.

As Verena Stefan writes, “No little girl in the world would, by herself, think up such a thing as placing clitoris and vagina in competition with one another, de- and revaluing them, creating an arbitrary conflict between two parts of her own body or, out of the blue, resolving to amputate a healthy organ.”1 Rather, “the clitoris appears as the primary threat to a phallocratic world view and to the power of individual men.”2

Ahmady never loses sight of this, reiterating (often) the challenges for him, as a man and a feminist, in trying to stop FGM in Iran. One of his most poignant scenes concerns the colloquy of males newly informed of what the custom brings women — risks and pain. “Later [the men] were asked whether, in light of their new knowledge…, they would be willing to have their daughters cut, thereby exposing them to the same agony in bed and perhaps to a husband who cheats. Our interviewees could not answer. Instead,” Ahmady writes, “silent, they looked away.” …

The work of unveiling the cutting culture in hitherto unrevealed places, in locations in Iran and elsewhere, is only just beginning, but it could not be more important in the struggle to make FGM history.  Kameel Ahmady’s contribution to that work is enormous.

From “AfterWords” by Tobe Levin and Hilary Burrage in Ahmady, Kameel. In the Name of Tradition. Female Genital Mutilation in Iran. 146-149.


[1] Verena Stefan. (2104) “Mutilation of the Vulva and Circumcision of other Female Freedoms – or the Perfect Vulva’s Aura and Revolt.” In Levin, Tobe, ed. Waging Empathy. Alice Walker, Possessing the Secret of Joy and the Global Movement to Ban FGM. Trans. Tobe Levin.  Frankfurt am Main: UnCUT/VOICES P., 69.

[2] Ibid. 68.

FGM in iran cover

Godfrey Williams-Okorodus. FGM in Iran. Watercolor. 2015.

What Are Harmful Traditional Practices (HTPs)? Why Do They Occur?

We can all appreciate the marriage of economics and psychology in this pioneering explanation.

Hilary Burrage

12.05.05 cutting 004a

Harmful traditional practices (HTPs) are group-sanctioned but usually now illegal actions taken to reinforce the power of one person or group over (an)other/s.  HTPs occur in all societies but are more prevalent in less advantaged communities than elsewhere; and women and girls are more likely to be the victims of HTPs than are boys and men, albeit both experience them in specific contexts.  HTPs are historically underpinned by contests for scarce resources and economic control and power. The recent past has seen global moves to address the issues and stop these practices.

Some examples of harmful traditional practices are listed below. NB This is not pleasant reading.

View original post 908 more words

Through the Eyes of Nigerian Artists Confronting FGM: An Exhibition, Oxford, June 2016

Through the Eyes of Nigerian Artists Confronting Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) 6th – 16th June, Lady Margaret Hall, Jerwood Room, University of Oxford Duke Asidere . Wande George . Helen Idehen .…

Source: Through the Eyes of Nigerian Artists Confronting FGM: An Exhibition, Oxford, June 2016

DAY of the African Child, June 16th, and Bloomsday: on art and FGM

Had you been in Soweto on June 16th, 1976, –forty years ago today –, you would have been awed by about 10,000 children, girls and boys, risking their lives in a ‘long march.’ The two-week protest to improve their schooling was disrupted by government bullets, killing hundreds and injuring far more. To enable our remembering the importance of children’s rights and especially the right to education, in 1991 the Organization of African Unity designated June 16th as the Day of the African Child.

Cheryl-Ann and Nolan Victory

Cheryl-Ann and Nolan Victory in Oxford. In the background are miniatures of paintings by Nigerian artists on FGM.

The struggle to enhance learning goes on, and teaching about FGM is increasingly important. But how can it be taught? What curriculum promises the most? Among strategies of choice, art is a privileged medium.

Somali author and educator Hibo Wardere, for instance, encourages her pupils to draw and paint their feelings when confronted by this painful topic. Community Mediator for Waltham Forest, Wardere brings the abolition message into UK schools, sensitizing pupils and staff at primary and secondary level. Breaking the silence — FGM is never mentioned at home — Hibo highlights danger signals. Is your classmate at risk of being taken abroad for FGM? she asks. It’s getting close to holiday time. Is she nervous, fidgety? “I tell my own story in graphic detail,” Hibo told us at an FGM symposium  at Lady Margaret Hall last year. “Three women come to your house and hold you so tight you can’t breathe. … I was screaming for my mum but all she said was quiet, be quiet, the neighbors will hear.” For Hibo, girls (and boys) should learn about the cutting. Why? In order to refuse. “They have the right to know and to say ‘NO’,” she insists.

But June 16th commemorates not only South African children’s courageous march to learn  – their saying ‘no’ to the ill they endured. It is surely serendipity that June 16th is Bloomsday, too, the twenty-four hours in 1904 when renowned Irish author James Joyce, in Ulysses, traces his hero’s steps through Dublin into the concluding chapter ending in Molly Bloom’s bed with her famous affirmative words – “yes I said yes I will yes.” Scholars devote their lives to this ‘seminal’ text, appropriate to mention here as the nadir of genital assault. For the knowledge that sexual pleasure, — jouissance –, exists stokes the rage at its destruction.

The illuminating, liberating medium was discussed at the vernissage which took place on June 6th as artist and curator Godfrey Williams-Okorodus reported how, once he’d begun to paint symbolic scenes protesting FGM, the topic wouldn’t let him go. Holger Postulart, of Global Alliance against FGM (Geneva) told a similar tale. Not an artist himself, he and associate Elisabeth Wilson founded an association to promote use of the arts – including music and literature – to address the emotional levels of meaning attached to FGM; they  brought the canvasses displayed at Lady Margaret Hall to the Human Rights Council and, in Switzerland and France, are also promoting a Chair in female genital mutilation studies. Similarly, Maggie O’Kane, recipient of British Journalist of the Year and Foreign Correspondent of the Year awards and head of the Guardian Global Campaign to End FGM, showed how media, acting on a pioneering understanding of the dialectical relationship between reporting and creating news, sponsored a poster competition among schoolgirls in Kenya whose prize-winning billboard was broadcast nationwide. Art, of course, benefits not only viewers but equally creators. Naomi Rosen, Alexander von Humboldt Fellow, described her research into trauma therapy, drama, and FGM as these unstudied but increasingly deployed approaches are implemented by healthcare and NGOs. And finally, Kaddy Touray (Oxford Against Cutting) introduced a key initiative in Oxford which, among many activities, encouraged pupils from age 13 to take up their brushes and easels. From workshops teaching the subject and relevant “campaigning skills,” a booklet emerged “to help professionals start conversations with girls at risk of FGM.” In addition to writing copy, students “ran an art competition,” determining criteria, themes, and winners. [See http://oxfordagainstcutting.org/schools-champions/cheney-school/%5D

To my knowledge, the paintings and sculpture on display at LMH represent the first of the world’s art exhibitions aimed at hastening the end of FGM.

Origins of the Exhibition and FGM in Nigeria. In the 1980s, Nkechi Nnaji, age five, underwent ‘female circumcision’. No simple ‘cut’, the damage was so severe that, while her peers attended school, she was hospitalized, time and again. Advertising executive Joy Keshi Walker met the suffering girl, then age 12, and was so moved by the ‘financial, physical and emotional torture’ she had borne that Joy ‘vowed then and there to do what [she] could’ to end the ‘rite’.[1] A specialist in visual communication, the social entrepreneur approached Sam Ovraiti, principal lecturer in painting and drawing at Auchi Polytechnic in Auchi, Nigeria. Could he gather students to attend a seminar in which Joy would teach them about FGM? There Joy and artist Godfrey Williams-Okorodus joined forces to create this exhibition.

Why art? A paradox, the aptness of the medium lies in its non-verbal, multi-sensory appeal, especially suitable in an environment where not everyone can read and while confronting a controversial issue as painful and dangerous as FGM, able to trigger flashbacks not only in the excised but also in the audience. Emotional impact can indeed be great but may also turn into constructive resolve. The first display in Lagos in October 1998, consisting of 80 artefacts hosted by the Goethe Institute, attracted politicians, diplomats, students, the press, as well as victims, by-standers, parents and girls. Its appeal to decision-makers, too, has been significant. Shortly after the exhibition travelled to a number of regions in Nigeria, two states abolished the practice, and recently, former president Goodluck Jonathan, in his last act in office, banned FGM for the nation as a whole. Given Nigeria’s 120 million people –the most populous African country–, where few of the ca. 250 ethnic groups are free of clitoral excision, Nigeria may account for as much as 25% of FGM worldwide.

When the exhibition moved to Germany, it was welcomed by Heidemarie Wieczorek-Zeul, then Cabinet Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development. In 2000, it attracted the attention of MP Christine McCafferty preparing to welcome passage of the renewed Female Genital Mutilation Act in a joint session of the Houses of Lords and Commons. On 22 November 2000, a selection of paintings displayed here at LMH were shown in Parliament for celebration of the enhanced legislation opposing FGM.

Once returned to Germany, the artworks travelled between 4 February 2000 and 26 February 2006 to more than 65 venues. They were displayed in federal, state and local ministries of health or city halls in all major urban centres. Expo 2000 presented the pictures; the GIZ – German counterpart to DFiD – invited the exhibition twice; women’s groups and civic organizations also found the canvasses appropriate, not only in raising awareness but in stimulating commitment to act. Most adept at breaking taboos, artists share their impressions, calling on intellect, feeling and heart. As Joy Keshi Walker resumes, art ennobles. About FGM, it is also about the artist, the viewer, and a future free from a harmful traditional practice that slows development, inscribes inequality, and causes untold suffering to generations of girls. The end is overdue.

If you are in or near Oxford, join us TONIGHT at Lady Margaret Hall, first in the Chapel, then in the Deneke Common Room, where canvasses address this millennial custom, break the omerta, and confront the viewer in a complex, nuanced way with one of the key on-going scourges of our times. The pictures detail aspects of the ‘rite’ as it has been and, sadly, continues to be practiced in Nigeria.

Tonight’s program includes Dr. Tobe Levin von Gleichen offering a narrated tour of the artwork followed by discussants Comfort Momoh MBE, FGM/Public Health Specialist; Hilary Burrage, sociologist and author; Nolan Victory, Equalities, Diversity & Human Rights Manager, London North West Healthcare NHS; Dr Barbara Harrell-Bond, OBE Rights in Exile Legal Aid; Dr Sharon Dixon, Donnington Medical Partnership in Oxford; Dr Phoebe Abe, Dr Abe Foundation and Fatou Ceesay (Oxford Against Cutting). Dr. Maria Jaschok, Director of the International Gender Studies Centre at LMH, will welcome you.

Finissage 16th June 6:30 p.m. in the CHAPEL, then in the DENEKE COMMON ROOM from 7 p.m. Lady Margaret Hall, University of Oxford

[1] Through the Eyes of Nigerian Artists: Confronting Female Genital Mutilation. Exhibition Catalogue. Vernissage in the USA. 6 April – 15 June 2006. Women’s Studies Research Center. Brandeis University.

Resources include Twitter: SupportGuardian@EndFGM

The Guardian Campaign: http://www.theguardian.com/society/video/2015/feb/06/highlights-of-the-guardians-global-media-campaign-to-help-end-fgm

The exhibition: https://www.facebook.com/stopfgmnow/photos/?tab=album&album_id=427511341804

Urhobo Bride

Godfrey Williams-Okorodus. The Urhobo Bride. Oil on Canvas. 1998. The painting was part of the original exhibition.


Olubunmi Temitope Oyesanya The Scourge. Oil on Canvas. 2009

Olubunmi Temitope Oyesanya. The Scourge. Oil on Canvas. 2008.

Through the Eyes of Nigerian Artists confronting FGM. An Exhibition at Lady Margaret Hall, University of Oxford

Godfrey Williams-Okorodus. "The Queue" [at a VVF clinic]. Watercolor. 1998.

Godfrey Williams-Okorodus. “The Queue” [at a VVF clinic]. 1998.

The United Nations declared 23 May the Day to End Obstetric Fistula (A/RES/67/147), a devastating side effect of FGM, “one of the most serious and tragic injuries that can occur during childbirth. [It] is a hole between the birth canal and the bladder or rectum caused by prolonged, obstructed labour without treatment” [www.un.org/en/events/endfistuladay/].

Artist Godfrey Williams-Okorodus evokes the search for therapy in “The Queue,” among eighty paintings expressing aspects of female genital mutilation committed to canvas when a travelling exhibition, conceived by Joy Keshi Walker, was first displayed in Lagos in October 1998.

The International Gender Studies Centre, Lady Margaret Hall, University of Oxford, with support from Oxford without Cutting and 28 Too Many, is hosting twenty of these artworks from 6th to 16th June 2016 in the Jerwood Room, welcoming viewers weekdays from noon until 6 p.m.

Vernissage 6th June 6 p.m. with Godfrey Williams-Okorodus, artist and curator; Hibo Wardere, author and educator; Holger Postulart and Elisabeth Wilson, the Global Alliance against FGM (Geneva); Maggie O’Kane, award-winning head of the Guardian Global Campaign to End FGM; Naomi Rosen, Alexander von Humboldt Fellowship recipient, and Kaddy Touray  (Oxford against Cutting)

Finissage 16th June 6 p.m. with Comfort Momoh MBE, FGM specialist midwife; Hilary Burrage, author; Nolan Victory, Equalities, Diversity & Human Rights Manager, London North West Healthcare NHS; Dr Barbara Harrell-Bond OBE, Rights in Exile Legal Aid; Dr Sharon Dixon, Donnington Medical Partnership in Oxford;  Dr Maria Jaschok, Director, IGS, and Fatou Ceesay.

Curator: Dr Tobe Levin von Gleichen. Historical exhibition curated by Joy Keshi Walker in Lagos and sponsored from 2000-2006 by FORWARD-Germany.

The 4 ‘E’s Of FGM Eradication – My Paper On The Economics Of FGM, At The UN Geneva IAC Meeting

Excellent contribution, Hilary, that reminded me of the theme chosen for the first exhibition of paintings against FGM with which your co-panelist Godfrey is associated. In 1998 in Lagos, Nigeria, curator Joy Keshi Walker’s catalogue featured the three S’s — the Sorrow, the Suffering, the Set-back, the last meaning precisely economic loss to the nation wounding half its people.

Hilary Burrage

16.05.12 IAC FGM Geneva Kaillie IMG_ (43)The Inter-African Committee on Harmful Traditional Practices affecting Women and Girls (the IAC) held an International Conference to End FGM at the United Nations in Geneva on 10 and 11 May 2016. The theme was ‘From Goals to Action: Working Together to Bridge Gaps‘. I spoke on the Economics of FGM. My main point? … that ending FGM will be achieved most quickly if we fully engage economic analysis of the wider contexts and use that analysis to inform Public Health budgets and strategies, with top-level leaders who accept direct accountability for delivery.

View original post 3,759 more words

For International Women’s Day, links and LIKES

Apprised of the suffering inflicted on millions of girls – an estimated 137,000 in the UK – Guardian journalist Maggie O’Kane believes in media’s power to help. With empathy and insight, she approached her editor. Would he agree to feature FGM? She wanted the paper to confront the custom in a way that had not been tried before – in a well-funded, tenacious multi-national campaign. He agreed, stating on camera, ‘We as a paper have committed ourselves to an international campaign to eradicate FGM’.

Launch of the Guardian campaign in the USA

Launch of the Guardian campaign in the USA

Thus, with full support, she and her team have gone on to expose what may be the most widespread crime of which, before The Guardian campaign, few people had heard. Even U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon joined in.Ban Ki-moon 2

Now, for International Women’s Day, a new facebook page is being launched. Your LIKE will ensure the campaign  carries on! Thank you! https://www.facebook.com/gdnendfgm/timeline

Plus, as Maggie writes, “the new and very moving film from Nigeria about one couple,  Abu and Gift Augustine, [who]   fight back.”  http://www.theguardian.com/end-fgm

And last not least, you, too, are certain to appreciate Alice Walker’s gift: http://alicewalkersgarden.com/2015/09/waging-empathy-alice-walker-posessing-the-secret-of-joy-and-the-global-movement-to-ban-fgm/